LOST-Theories.com

I asked an accurate question. “Where is The Sun?” “Have you ever seen the sun in the show? I don’t mean Sun, Jin’s wife. I haven’t seen the moon either. Am I wrong? if I am right why haven’t anyone in the show mentioned this? Is it normal ? ”

And I saw this question in “Not a theory ” section instead of “Latest ” section if we can’t argue these question like these, how could this site would be attractive to viewers of the Lost? I am not a scientist. I am not a theorist. I am the one who love to watch the show. I would like to know the answers of the secrets of the show.

So what? Do you want me to add a stupid theory that only is a theory? or do you want me to share my observations which can contribute to reveal mysteries of the show? That is your choice.

Comments

  1. pacey Mar 27, 2008 3:17 a.m. Comment: 1

    good point, i can’t recall seeing the moon or sun but then again i havn’t gone out of my way to find them,i do remember seeing stars and clouds though.

  2. psychoblubber Mar 27, 2008 3:22 a.m. Comment: 2

    i agree. the same reason maybe daniel said light and shadows are different on the island. good point.

  3. boybacon Mar 27, 2008 4:45 a.m. Comment: 3

    We want you to share your theories, not your observations… the website is called lost-theories, not lost-observations.

    If you want to post your observations on the show, then why not head over to the official lost message board, or one of the many other sites where people are posting their observations.

    Or, come up with a theory about your observation — why do you think we’ve never seen the sun or moon in the show? Do you think that this somehow relates to why the island seems to be invisible to the outside world?

  4. TOST Mar 27, 2008 5:28 a.m. Comment: 4

    boybacon, I appreciate your toughts. I mean it is not necessary to try us to make a theory. I like to be a part of something. Maybe you can do it one when you see my observations. If you do that I would be happy not sad. Maybe then I could make it one, who knows. I stress that it is not the only way to share our thoughts is to make a theory. I want to open a discussion to do this.

    But if you like me to make a theory. ok. “The producers want to show us there is something weird in the island thorough not to show the sun and the moon. Faraday commented that light is different in the island. This is a sign. They will deliberatly not to show them. Maybe there are not exist. If so the location of the island is unique.

  5. helloladies_itshurleytime Mar 27, 2008 7:06 a.m. Comment: 5

    The people who made the site put this on the homepage…

    Whether you’ve got some minor speculation about a particular character or a full-blown LOST theory, this is the place to put it.”

    If they don’t care, then why should anyone else.

  6. Irocz28 Mar 27, 2008 8:03 a.m. Comment: 6

    TOST, it is nice to see a good observation and then a theory on what you think about your observation. I am predicting that we are going to be overloaded with simple observations in the upcoming weeks, most of which we have already seen and discussed. This is, of course, due to the break and people watching earlier seasons over again.

    I’m not referring to your observation, which is a good one.

  7. kselvog Mar 27, 2008 8:16 a.m. Comment: 7

    I’ve seen the sun in numerous episodes, and there are people on this board who have theories on where the island is located based on where the sun was in certain episodes. I recall seeing the sun in Meet Kevin Johnson…can’t remember what part but it was very bright and low in the sky.

  8. TOST Mar 27, 2008 8:32 a.m. Comment: 8

    helloladies_itshurleytime, I agree with you. Irocz28, your wiev is insightful, good to see a person like you. kselvog, you may see the sun outside of the island in the show. It is normal because it doesn’t relate to island. I may be wrong but I don’t remember to show them (the sun and the moon) to us while people are on the island.

  9. lateralus Mar 27, 2008 8:41 a.m. Comment: 9

    Have you ever seen the sun or moon in any other tv show. I can’t recall ever seeing it durring Starsky and Hutch. We never see the characters take a dump either. That doesn’t meant that the island has some kind of “magic digestive properties”.

    Thats IT!!! A magic island where no one has to use the bathroom!!! We see a shower and sink int the hatch. but no toilet!!!! Thats why so many people are trying to capture the island and its powers!!!

  10. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 9:01 a.m. Comment: 10

    What do you think it means? Several of us told you in response to your earlier post that we thought it meant nothing. If you think it means something, tell us what it might mean. Then you have a theory.

    With no theory, this appears to be a trite and inconsequential question — which is not a theory.

  11. TOST Mar 27, 2008 9:08 a.m. Comment: 11

    lateralus, People are on the island, not street. They are in the nature. The sun and the moon are part of the nature. We nearly see everything on the island. Trees, houses, animals and mountains. nearly 4 season has passed, we have never seen the sun and the moon. isn’t it weird? There are many romantic scenes at night. Night, full moon and romance. But we haven’t seen it. Where is the sunset, where is the phosphorescence in the sea. I don’t buy it.

  12. TOST Mar 27, 2008 9:18 a.m. Comment: 12

    ChuckhG, Don’t you see what it is written? Don’t you read Irocz28 has written. You read first then make a comment. I made a theory my friend but I think you don’t want to see it?? I write it again, maybe you can read this time. “But if you like me to make a theory. ok. “The producers want to show us there is something weird in the island thorough not to show the sun and the moon. Faraday commented that light is different in the island. This is a sign. They will deliberatly not to show them. Maybe there are not exist. If so the location of the island is unique. ”

  13. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 9:23 a.m. Comment: 13

    TOST — then tell us your theory. You rarely see the sun on any television show (or movie) unless they make a point of showing you the sun. It is hard to film the sun and it causes everything else to be cast in shadows. Frequently the sun is intentionally blocked during outdoor shooting.

    Also,all the other things you are talking about are on ground level. We see the ground because people are on the ground.

    Also, I think if there was no sun or moon, it would have been mentioned (since it is something the survivors would have noticed). They have not said anything, so there is no reason to think they are not there.

    My guess is that if you watch all 70+ episodes again, you will find a scene where you can see the sun or the moon or at least proof of their existance. Why don’t you look again and let us know.

  14. lateralus Mar 27, 2008 9:36 a.m. Comment: 14

    The Sun and Moon are at different positions throughout the day. You know, the whole watches and clocks, telling time and so forth. TV shows have to edit most of the stuff they shoot. So they make it a point not to film them.

    Imagine trying to film a scene of Hurley skipping rocks at sundown. Sounds pretty. Now that ideal sundown time is only going to last a few minutes. It would take several days and several camera angles to edit that scene together and make that work right and still have the same pretty sundown.

    Seems easier to film at noon when the sun doesn’t cast a such an obstuctive shadow. Camera work is all light and shadows.

  15. TOST Mar 27, 2008 9:40 a.m. Comment: 15

    Well my friend you are not sure that I am wrong? It is a progress.

    First you said there is no theory and flagged it Not a theory and caused it to move Not a theory section. Now you say watch 70+ episodes again??

    What is your problem my friend? Do you always want to hear what you want to hear. I advise you to buy MP3, you can listen what you want to hear.

    I want to share my thoughts with people in this site. If you don’t want to take them then you can look at another theories.

  16. TOST Mar 27, 2008 9:46 a.m. Comment: 16

    lateralus, your explanations sound good. I don’t say anything about them. I say we should have seen once them in the show . It is weird to me not to see them at once on the island. We will see if I am onto something later in the show.

  17. smokeman Mar 27, 2008 10:12 a.m. Comment: 17

    so who are you bacon boy, the theory police?

  18. Appolobar Mar 27, 2008 10:14 a.m. Comment: 18

    lateralus - you have an excellent point. Was about to say so myself. We, as watchers, want to believe that everything happens on a timeline for the characters of the show. Well these sometimes take many many shoots to get the scene right. If we did see the sun or moon, TOST, then this post would be about how the show has production errors.

    I like your observation, though. And I dont think people should be harsh just because you dont have a full blown theory. BUT it just so happens that there is a section of this site dedicated to observations and questions and unfortunately, that section is called “not really theories.” AND unfortunately, when something gets moved to that section, it is not viewed nearly as much. It is just the way the site is. Nobody is telling you not to post your observations, we are just telling you that they need to get moved to the proper section by us flagging it properly. Lots of people come to this site to read theories and we want to find our stuff in the proper section. It is all just the way it is organized to make it easier to weed through all of the posts to find what we are looking for.

    I do like your observation, even though I think there is a simple explanation for it. So I am going to give a +1 for thinking outside the box. Good work!

  19. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 10:20 a.m. Comment: 19

    I think there should be more tolerance for observations/ questions/etc., especially when they are not the SOS as created a million times before, as this one wasn’t.

    TOST, I don’t have an answer for you, never really thought about it, so this was a new topic. But I think lateralus seemed to have a good line of reasoning on the subject.

  20. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 10:40 a.m. Comment: 20

    Your post crossed mine — the site has a delay. Relax.

    What you posted in the comment is not really a theory either. I thought you were trying to be silly. Sorry. You are saying it is strange that we have not seen the moon or the sun. We are telling you it is not strange.

    Faraday said the light doesn’t bend as it should. The island is different/weird/unique. Those are not theories. Those are things we already know.

    So that leaves [and I am fixing your post]: Maybe the sun and moon do not exist on the island.

    Is that your theory? If so, it barely qualifies. What does this imply? Are we on another planet? Another plane of existance? If it is a theory, it is based solely on your belief that you never saw the sun or moon in any episode. I think you may be incorrect in that belief, but even if we haven’t actually seen it , the Losties would certainly have said something like “Hey! Where the f- is the sun?” if there was no sun.

    And here is more: We can assume there is a sun because we have day and we have night. The days and nights appear to be the same length as they are on earth. The moon is fairly inconsequential in this respect — but we do see the tide go in and out, so there is likely a moon as well.

    So you really thought it was necessary to bring up this rather inconsequential (and possibly erroneous) observation again rather than let it die (at least until you can come up with a reason why it is important)?

    And after I typed all that — Can you identify that shining orb above Hurley from the first episode this season?

    sunh

    Case closed.

  21. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 10:42 a.m. Comment: 21

    ozzig — this will show up after my other post which is rather conclusive on the issue — but I pointed out precisely what lateralus pointed out here when TOST made a nearly identical post yesterday (without the whining about being moved to “Not a Theory”). TOST just doesn’t want to accept it. But now the case is closed and this thread and “theory” can die.

  22. lateralus Mar 27, 2008 10:42 a.m. Comment: 22

    Sorry if i came off as crass. I’m sure its just a TV thing. Like why everybody has pearly white teath and ripped abs. The women don’t have hairy armpits, and the men don’t have 90 days of beard growth.

    We also havn’t seen the freighter from the island, or the island from the freighter’s perspective.

  23. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 10:52 a.m. Comment: 23

    Good ole Chuck. There was no need to single me out for my innocuous comment trying to ne nice to TOST, now was there? I’m not the one who has been arguing here.

  24. TOST Mar 27, 2008 10:52 a.m. Comment: 24

    That is what I wanted to. I mean we have to talk about it and tell our opinions. I have said lateralus’ s explanations sound good. You know man of science/ man of faith. Producers often gives chance to pick a side. They do not emphisize to one overhelmingly.

    You know the last episode, Michael bought the gun to shoot himself then Mr. Friendly took the gun. Did he change the gun or island has an effect on it? You can choose whatever you want. In this discussion, you can pick a side that it is a filming procedure not to shoot them (the sun and the moon) or you can say that it is not normal not to see them once. I think Faraday will help us what it is meaning. ( I think he is the only guy give us clear information so far) or Producers see my opinion and decided to part them in one episode to clear it :)

  25. So_Lost Mar 27, 2008 10:56 a.m. Comment: 25

    ChuckG is awesome!

  26. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:02 a.m. Comment: 26

    ozzig — good ole chuck because I got irritated enough to find an answer to a question that TOST should have found himself/herself? or good ole chuck because I got irritated by you again trying to defend someone who was in the wrong. I disagree with you on the tolerance for observations and questions UNLESS they bear directly on a theory. There are dozens of other places that will accept your observations and questions without theories. Here, the observations and questions should be tied to a theory — or else we get a billion posts that push the real content out of sight. Anyway, TOST got an answer yesterday before he was pushed to the “Not really theories” list. He didn’t like the answer so he posted again without addressing anything he was already told.

    TOST — Is that your way of apologizing? Admitting you were wrong? I don’t understand.

  27. TOST Mar 27, 2008 11:04 a.m. Comment: 27

    ChuckG, what is yor problem again? Do you know you from somewhere? I think you don’t have to be stubborn. You explained your wiev, thanks. If I see the sun (sunset maybe) and the moon I will be appreciate that you are right. If you find a full picture of the sun let me know. I think you started to watch them. good for you :)

  28. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:08 a.m. Comment: 28

    TOST — there is a sun. Why can’t you admit it? .

    I will suggest that others mark this thread debunked and not a theory as I am now.

    The sun exists! It is a miracle!

  29. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 11:21 a.m. Comment: 29

    Chuck , I wasn’t “defending” anyone despite your paranoid interpretation of my comment. It would be nice if people were a little more tolerant, period.

    But what I would truly like to know, is who the hell do you think you are????? You have been behaving like you have the right to be judge and jury over every single post and every poster. You pick out people you don’t like, and then you continually goad them. You say you want to get rid of the “trolls” . Hell, you LIVE for trolls and posting your little photos all over the place, you WANT trolls around , and you will work OT to create them if you can. You LOVE trolls, it’s how get your rocks off fighting with them. Even after a “troll” has ceased battle, there YOU are, trying to keep it going like the energizer bunny.

    This post here is a prime example of what I’m talking about. But hell, there’s plenty of proof all over the board.

    Let me just say that I’m on to you and your little war game tactics. And as long as there are things like you slithering out from under rocks, there’s going to be someone like me waiting to step on you.

  30. boybacon Mar 27, 2008 11:22 a.m. Comment: 30

    TOST, if there were no sun and moon on the island, would one of the characters not have mentioned it by now? Would this not have been a fairly major change of circumstances for everyone on the plane, to suddenly be stranded on an island where they can’t see the sun or moon anymore?

    Maybe they’ve been so preoccupied with all the polar bears and smoke monsters that they just haven’t noticed that the sun has disappeared. Is that what you are trying to get us to believe?

  31. dabiatchishere Mar 27, 2008 11:32 a.m. Comment: 31

    Well, it is always nice to see the “Site Bullies” are out making comment, as usual.

    I see the bullies remain the same, but only their names have changed! hmmmm!

    Something which I know many of the site members here have already figured out!

    Miss Ozzig, You are indeed a class act! You always tell it like it is!

  32. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:35 a.m. Comment: 32

    A couple of more

    — in the episode where Sawyer and Kate escape from the Hydra station with Karl — when they get back to the main island. Karl looks up and says something like “There is not going to be a moon tonight.” He doesn’t say — “we can’t see the moon on the island because we are in the twilight zone.” And Kate and Sawyer don’t answer by sayingL “Hey Bobby, we haven’t seen the moon since we got here.”

    Also, here is another picture of a sunset from Season 3 — Sorry TOST, you can’t have a sunset without a sun.

    sunset

    Sorry, TOST. You are toast.

    By the way, these pics were not difficult to find. Look for your answer (or accept the ones you are given) before you ask a bad question a second time.

  33. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:43 a.m. Comment: 33

    ozzig — I am intolerant of people who ignore reason and do things that piss off everyone else. Like double posting. Be on to me, ozzig. There is nothing to be on too.

    You asked why I singled you out? because you were the one who came on here defending TOST. you said that we should be more tolerant but TOST proved he didn’t deserve tolerance. You even agreed with someone who debunked TOAST’s theory — I told you that that explanation has already been provided to TOST but he refused to accept or address it and, instead, made a duplicate post. You coming on here with the “tolerance of inappropriate behavior” attitude just makes this board less tolerable.

    (by the way, how is my interpretation “paranoid” anyway?)

    and

    I am on to you too.

  34. dabiatchishere Mar 27, 2008 11:44 a.m. Comment: 34

    Btw, Ozzig I would like nothing more than to help you “step on” OUR SITE bullies!

    Speaking of toast, I really do smell something burning!

  35. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:45 a.m. Comment: 35

    and I am not going to comment, dab. not your fight.

  36. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:55 a.m. Comment: 36

    step on me ladies. I might enjoy it.

    By the way — I have only one vote but this “theory” is now in the categories it rightfully belongs — as “not really a theory” and, if a theory, “debunked.” So there are obviously others that agree with me. You can dismiss me and disagree with my tactics but I make this site a better place.

    You want me on this site! You need my on this site*

    jackn

  37. dabiatchishere Mar 27, 2008 11:55 a.m. Comment: 37

    Listen Chuckles, You don’t own me and I have no horse in this race, but the last time I looked around it is still a democratic society, where there is a right to free speech, and people other than yourself get to have a say!

    Therefore, I am exercising my right to free assembly by speaking out against what everybody on this site has observed! The site bullies. If that offends you, so be it. You are one, IMO.

    No doubt you will have more to say, because you never STFU. I will be personally be routing for the day, when you get your come uppance!

    PS: Please make note to yourself, that I would rather be set on fire than argue with a MORON like you!

  38. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 11:56 a.m. Comment: 38

    Ok UpChuck, so now we take the gloves off? Let’s get to it then.

    I did not defend TOST, I was polite to him, and not at the expense of anyone else. Your paranoia said otherwise.

    You’re a bully and a 2-bit dictator wannabe who uses multiple ID’s to police this site. I probably haven’t even come close to tracking down all of them, but I know enough of them to know that you are a TROLL. Not the minor annoyance kind, but the putrid cesspool kind that insideously infiltrates a site like this.

  39. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 12:07 p.m. Comment: 39

    lol… look who is calling people names — dab’s with “MORON” and ozzig with “UpChuck” — am I in third grade again? Be careful. I may have to pull your pigtails.

    I am not a bully. I say what I believe — just like you do, ozzig, and just like dab’s defends her right to do. I back up everything I say and I don’t back down when I believe something.

    I have avoided calling people names or even using the term “Troll” because it upset people. Now you both appear to dislike me because I speak my mind.

    What paranoia? go back and look at my initial response to you — I was explaining what happened — how is that paranoid?

    I suggest you both take a deep breath and think about what you are saying because you are both turning into the bullies you think you are fighting.

  40. dabiatchishere Mar 27, 2008 12:14 p.m. Comment: 40

    Nice try Chuck! It is more than apparent who the bullies really are around here!

    As always, I go in peace!

  41. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 12:20 p.m. Comment: 41

    Chuck, your little table turning tricks won’t work. This isn’t only about this post , it’s about all of your behavior. You think you can turn things around with your insinuations, half-truths and outright lies. But the truth is you have been calling people trolls, and you have been insulting people, don’t forget about all your little photos you’re so fond of.

    You’ve also been harassing people, like TOST here for example. You chose to stay here prove prove prove you are right right right, on HIS OWN POST. State your disagreement with his observation about a TV SHOW and move on, but you don’t do that. You stay here and you BULLY him. Note he had no problem with anyone else here, no one but you, and golly gee, why is that? Could it be because I’m speaking up the truth about you?

  42. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 12:47 p.m. Comment: 42

    Nice try.

    potkettle

  43. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 1:30 p.m. Comment: 43

    Chuck, you’re just flat out a liar. I speak up the truth, not even close to what you’ve been doing. Your pot and kettle BS is exactly what it looks like—BS.

    But really, it doesn’t matter. I know there are plenty of people who know exactly what I’m talking about. You’ll get your comeuppence one of these days, and I won’t be feeling a bit sorry for you.

  44. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 1:49 p.m. Comment: 44

    You are just wrong, ozzig. I suggest you just ignore anything that I do that you believe is “trollish” instead of behaving like a hostile troll yourself. You want to define me and put me into a corner, but you can’t.

    What is the comeuppence? What are you talking about? Let me suggest that you back off for a little while and reread this thread after you have calmed down. Then consider who is being the obnoxious troll and who is the rational one. If you want to blame it on me and tell me I bring out the worst in you (and TOST) by writing and debating passionately and literately, I can accept that.

    I understand that some people don’t like me because I try to make this place better for those who want to post and discuss theories intelligently. I also recognize that I will get beligerant and refuse to concede a point when I know I am right. You are just going to accept that is the way it is. As I said, ignore me if that brings out the evil side in you.

    And I like the pictures. They are easy to do and add a little color to the site (which is kinda drab in appearance). I hope others like them too — in fact you are the first one to bring them up in harrassing me. (Is that what upsets you? The pictures?).

    So come and get me… and my team: team

    We are waiting. (You see, I know you like the pictures… everyone does…)

  45. lockeko Mar 27, 2008 2:13 p.m. Comment: 45

    is claire pregnang again? are they bringing back boone and shannon?

  46. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 2:26 p.m. Comment: 46

    LOL.

    Time loop theory.

    And I just liked the old photo with none of them smiling and all looking kind of raw. They are too hollywood now! I thought this was more appropriate. Do you think I choose my pictures without due care?

  47. Appolobar Mar 27, 2008 3:54 p.m. Comment: 47

    Chuck, I do like your pictures. I dont like your attitude all of the time but the pics are cool when used to illustrate a point. Like the ones we see the sun that disprove the observation that there is no sun in Lost. That is even better than talking about it. It is proof. I do think that some people may take your comments as being waaay to harsh sometimes and that not only offends people, but it also makes you seem very hipocritical and self-important and that severely damages your credibility. I am not against you, brother, I dont even know you. Trust me, I have been accused of being rude on this site when I honestly did not mean to be. But I am trying to give you an outsider prospective. Maybe you really dont know how you come across to people. Feel free to be mad or tell me that this is none of my business but this is a public post, after all.

  48. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 4:18 p.m. Comment: 48

    It is an open forum, brother. I stand by what I say (most of the time) and my response is gaged to the debate. You are welcome to state your opinion.

    If someone wants to tell me that I am out of line, I will explain why I reached that level — in this case, I did become patronizing with TOST because he refused to accept reason — I tried to explain that to ozzig when she defended TOST but that just made her explode.

    When others (who I call the “repeat defenders”) come in to the middle of a debate/argument/brawl and tell the wrong doer that they are not doing anything wrong and it’s all the critics fault — well — they have the right to do that — but sometimes they might want to just mind their own buisness and let the thread die (as this one should have at least 25 posts go). If they turn up the heat, I can take that too. If it is perceived as going too far — well, it is an internet forum and that happens.

    I am anything but a bully.

    Me:

    CB

  49. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 4:42 p.m. Comment: 49

    Chuck, there you go again, painting yourself as the poor misunderstood good guy. Well, you’re not. This “repeat defender” as you refer to, speaks out because I’ve seen you repeatedly provoking people, on their own posts that you won’t leave, until you calmly and smugly goad them into losing their temper, and then you claim you were the good guy who fought the big bad troll. I know a manipulative troll when I see one, and I’ve got to say, you’ve really got your act down pat. But not enough to fool me or some others on the site. The difference between you and I is that you’re into manipulating and baiting people and I’m not. It’s true I’ve got a temper, but I call it as i see it, and I’m not stupid and I know what your game is.

  50. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 4:49 p.m. Comment: 50

    And Appolobar, I know you aren’t on sides or anything like that, but still I thank you. Maybe you got through to him where me and my temper have not. You’re nice, and I apologize for my outbursts, but I’ve long since passed the point of nice with him.

  51. blondegop_ Mar 27, 2008 5:04 p.m. Comment: 51

    Own it Chuckie…you want this…you love it. You have been waiting for your chance on the stage. You pop up on every theory with your pictures (which I like btw), you egg on the trolls, you hate on the new posters. You get what pay for sweetie…

  52. dabiatchishere Mar 27, 2008 5:26 p.m. Comment: 52

    Bravo Blondegop! I liked you from the beginning! Clever girl too!

    Hey Chuckles, Why haven’t you travelled over to the Offensive section, and defend Locko? Oh, I get it! You only do battle with newbies and women. You don’t have the balls to stand up against “real men” and duke it out.

    The day ever comes, that a bully like you elects themselves as the LT Police, is the day I turn into one of biggest pimp-ass troll biatch’s this site has ever seen with the sole intent of taking you down! I know I will have plenty of company!

    Your 15 seconds of shame are officially over!

    As always, I leave in peace!

  53. blondegop_ Mar 27, 2008 6:01 p.m. Comment: 53

    Right back at ya Dab.

  54. ozzig Mar 27, 2008 6:28 p.m. Comment: 54

    Ok, I feel better now. Thank you Blonde and Dab. Sometimes I feel like I’m the only one who speaks up with my original name and calls it like it is, but I’m glad to see I’m not alone. Chucks pictures CAN be good when used for information. My issue was that he claimed he never called anyone a troll or insulted them (he just puts up pictures of trolls and insults) which was a manipulative skew of the truth. As is everything he says. He baits and sets up, so he can then be the hero of the day at the end. I’ve seen people like that in the workplace. It always catches up with them.

  55. blondegop_ Mar 27, 2008 6:56 p.m. Comment: 55

    Ozz…you are nothing but a breath of fresh & fiesty air XXXOOO

  56. lockeko Mar 27, 2008 9:30 p.m. Comment: 56

    so in response to the acutal question, I agree with the commenters that the sun and moon do appear basically normal to the losties. My evidence of this is that no one has noted their absence.

  57. ChuckG Mar 27, 2008 11:57 p.m. Comment: 57

    dabs — I have defended lockeko (the real one) several times. I have attacked his attacker pretty viciously because he was being viciously attacked.

    blonde — ozz is a breath of fresh air because she blows up at me, calls me names and says I am paranoid (which she still hasn’t explained)? OK. That is pretty stale air where I come from.

    ozzig — you are so wrong here it is ridiculous. Sorry, ozz. You have gone out of your way to attack me when I have attacked trolls, repetitive and beligerant posters and other site abusers. You don’t like me. That is fine. You have your little group that will see you in the best light possible, that is fine. But you are far from innocent.

    Everyone who is interested (why would you be), read my posts (and the responses) above — in order — as they happened. Don’t start with the flames by ozzig or others. If you follow it post by post, it is pretty clear that I only became heated in response to TOST or ozzig flaming me first. I am not always innocent. Far from it. But I have far less fault than the flamers in this thread.

    Sleep well… until tomorrow…

    sunset

  58. Appolobar Mar 31, 2008 1:09 p.m. Comment: 58

    Hahahaa you guys are funny.. I keep returning to this post because it is better than watching a soap opera. I wish I knew the ages of everyone on here. Haha. I usually just chalk everything up to “agree to disagree” but that all changes when you are personally attacked. I get it. I will check this post more than once a day until it goes bye bye. Love you guys. Haha!!

  59. jewells Apr 1, 2008 3:28 p.m. Comment: 59

    This is the most fun I’ve had all day.

  60. Warewolf Apr 1, 2008 4:56 p.m. Comment: 60

    I don’t think it’s funny at all. Whatever the age of the participants, is no younger than the age of the overeager audience Appolobar and jewells. ChuckG was a complete jerk first to TOST and then ozzig, so they fought back. Nothing funny about that. He always starts it with someone or the other. The only thing good about this was seeing him get is ass kicked like he deserves.

  61. Appolobar Apr 1, 2008 6:11 p.m. Comment: 61

    Alright, alright, Warewolf. I apologize only for having a twisted sense of humor. No need to get started on me. I am a nice girl, I promise.