LOST-Theories.com

if Jacob is in some way a representative of God, or God-like powers, and Ben is using him (and presumably to dole out Ben’s justice?)—Is mercy trying to manifest itself through the Losties? When various eyes are shown at the beginning of episodes—is this the merciful God trying to see the island?

— jazprof

A lot of different directions to go in, but I think I found a good starting place in the scene in which Juliet says she’s showing Jack “To Kill a Mockingbird” but is actually showing him the tape with her instructions to kill Ben during the surgery. (And just to summarize on the contents of that tape & Ben taking Jack to the funeral & explaining “his plan”—I think this all falls into the Ben-Juliet Long Con of Jack category.)

To Kill a Mockingbird”

Central quotation: the father, Atticus Finch, gives his children air-rifles and tells them they can kill as many bluejays as they want, but “it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird,” when the main character, Scout asks about this later another character explains it’s a sin because all mockingbirds do is “sing their hearts out for us.” (Note: bluejays, on the other hand, steal the eggs and hatchlings of other birds—hmmmm, something familiar there….)

Quotation ties into three connected themes in the novel, justice, mercy, and the death of innocents. Atticus defends an innocent black man, Tom Robinson, on the charge of raping a white woman. Though it’s clear to everyone that Tom is innocent he is still convicted and later is killed while trying to escape. Another innocent in the novel is Boo Radley, the strange reclusive man who lives near the Finches in a wooden shack (kinda like you know who). Boo is not seen until the end of the novel, though Scout and her brother Jem communicate with him by leaving things for him in the hollow of a tree. Boo leaves the children crude wooden replicas of themselves that he has whittled for them. Very, very like the replicas of Annie and Ben. At the end of the novel, the real villian in the rape case, an abusive father named Bob Euell, attacks Jem and Scout on their way home from school. Boo rescues the children and kills him. When the sheriff and Atticus talk about what happened and how justice will be served—killing a mockingbird is used as a metaphor for what it would be like to drag Boo Radley into court. Mercy wins out over justice (which hadn’t worked too well in the court case anyway) and they decide that Mr. Euell “fell on his knife.”

That connection of Boo Radley to Jacob does make me wonder if the wooden dolls Annie had actually came from Jacob and whether she was in contact with him before Ben was.

All of those themes tie into the episode—especially in two contrasting versions of God (just/merciful) and the idea of sacrifice. One other juxtaposition about God to pull in before talking about details of the episode though—Ben says to Jack that the fact that a plane crashed with a spinal surgeon aboard is proof of God’s existence. But in captivity at the Swan, Ben tells Locke that God can’t see the island. My interpretation of that seeming contradiction is that Ben sees God in this egocentric way—as doing things for him—which makes me wonder if he’s talking about God to Jack, or is he talking about Jacob. When talking to Locke—I think he means that the merciful God can’t see the island. So two things about that—if Jacob is in some way a representative of God, or God-like powers, and Ben is using him (and presumably to dole out Ben’s justice?)—Is mercy trying to manifest itself through the Losties? When various eyes are shown at the beginning of episodes—is this the merciful God trying to see the island? In the episode when asked if he is a good man or a bad man, Eko says, “only God knows.”

Episode breakdown:

Eko and Yemi as children—Eko steals for Yemi because he is hungry. The Nun insists that hunger does not matter; he has sinned and must confess. Justice, not mercy. The same force manifested in the smoke monster and which kills Eko. Later there is a scene in the village which very closely parallels the moment from Eko’s childhood in which he was forced to join the militia (starting him on the road of sin for which he is going to be “justly” punished by Smokie). The militia shows up and demands protection money. Eko in priestly garb refuses; the militia leader shoots a blind woman. So whether he gives in to the militia or stands up to them—somone dies. Justice is blind. Also, to me, there’s a parallel being made between that harsh version of confession represented by the Nun and the extortion of money for protection by the militia guys.

Sayid asks what happened to Eko and Charlie replies “Before or after we saved him from the polar bear caves?” This fits with my idea that Eko was actually attacked before the polar bears (by smokie). (B&W allusions: Smokie/Polar Bears; Smoke/Vincent; Eko seeing black smoke/Locke saw white light.)

(Black Smoke) Yemi appears to Eko. (From now on referred to as BS Yemi). Insists on confession—FB scene that follows is one that immediately precedes real Yemi refusing Eko’s confession. Real confession is not a punishment (justice), but a sign of repentence and mercy. BS Yemi is carrying a lighter—kind of odd. Shortly after the hut is on fire and this diverts everyone while Eko wanders off. So I’m thinking, lighter—Jacob doesn’t like technology—Smokie and whoever is controlling him (Ben) are not technophobes.

Ben takes Jack to the funeral—another fire. Funeral combines Hindu (dressing in white), Christian (baptism), Pagan (burial at sea and fire). Others burn bodies. Yemi’s body might have burned in the plane fire. Don’t know what happened to Christian’s body. BS Yemi might have been trying to burn Eko. Do Ashes have some special power? Is this tied to whatever is around Jacob’s shack?

Locke & Des & Sayid talk—Locke and Des both gesticulating with knives in their hands. Hunters. Locke says about going after Eko: “We’re all going to the same place.” (an example of Mercy—Justice, in contrast, divides where people will go based on punishment.) Later Locke invites everyone who wants to to go with him—’cause it’s a free island. Hurley says, if it were Jack, he’d go alone or take Sayid or Kate. Mercy is freely given to all; Justice is a meritocracy.

Locke says to Desmond “Don’t mistake coincidence for fate.” Think this is very important so just want to draw special attention: Des’s turn to try to learn how to deal with his gift. Did he in fact make that mistake? By doing so, did he ‘cause the death of an innocent—Charlie. (Charlie as mockingbird—someone who wanted to sing his heart out for us?)

Flashback—Eko returns as priest with Yemi’s blood on his hands. Sees Christ on the cross. Eko’s sin, but also the way in which sin is washed away by mercy/grace. Eko is later rebuked by the choiboy (the same one who appears in the vision, for washing the blood away with holy water. The choir boy says that he shouldn’t do that, that’s not what holy water is for. Isn’t that exactly what its’ for? (Plot question, how does Eko so easily substitute for Yemi with no one asking questions?)

In the present: Eko in the jungle being led by Smokie (Smokie leads people to judgement for their past vs. Vincent—leads people to unfolding of future). Eko takes up a new stick (lacks the cross and his Jesus stick).

At the river—think this is the same river that Locke and Sawyer cross in “The Brig” (Sawyer with bloody feet)—the river Jordan? Symbolizes transitions of slavery/freedom, sin/purification, life/death. This is then followed by the FB moment about the militia which I referred to above. Mercy and Justice juxtaposed.

Chummy scene between Juliet and Jack—she brings him a hamburger on a platter with a big silver dome atop it—kinda like pictures from the comic book where there’s an island with a dome atop it (axis mundi). Yup, if only we knew how to lift up that there dome we’d be having all the cheeseburgers we could eat, and, oh yeah, maybe God’d see the island. Ben says to Jack that his plan got “shot to sunshine.” “Sunshine”? Isn’t it usually something like shot to pieces, shot to smithereens, shot to hell? “Sunshine” makes me think of the “sunshine” laws which mean you can look at secret files the government has on you. Ben doesn’t like sunshine; he likes secrets. Jack on the other hand says he doesn’t like mysteries.

At the Pearl—the wiring only goes one way? And yet Mikhail sees them, seeing him?

Final confrontation with BS Yemi—field of red flowers. Made me think of the poppies in the Wiz of Oz—Eko is being deluded. BS Yemi says “You speak to me as if I was your brother”—Eko thought he was speaking to a representative of God (his brother) when he said “I am not sorry for this…”—But it wasn’t God.

What “cost” does God demand for life? Doesn’t God in fact give his own life for the lives of others—the sacrifice of an innocent is the cost for our lives. If a cost is being demanded of us (as in the confession the Nun demands, or in justice)—is this really God making the demand?

Key characters

Short Name Full Name Episodes Theories
Ben Benjamin Linus 3.20, 4.9, & 3” href=”/episodes/theres-no-place-home-parts-2-3/”>4.13 1713
Eko Mr. Eko 2.21, 3.5, 2.7, 2.10 287

Key episodes

# Title Aired Central character Theories
3.5 The Cost Of Living 11-1-2006 Eko 139

Comments

  1. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 10:16 a.m. Comment: 1

    It would appear that the Others are “Blue Jays” and the Losties are “Mocking Birds”.

    It’s interesting that after only a week or two of being on the island, the Losties (led by Jack) appear to take on the characteristic of protection or a Blue Jay.

    Yes, stealing nests (or wombs) sounds very familiar.

    I need to watch “The Cost of Living” again. There could be some clues.

  2. AngeloComet Dec 14, 2007 10:50 a.m. Comment: 2

    You’re tackling big ideas here, Jaz! And the trouble with this issue, and Eko’s ‘judgement’ at the hands of the Black Smoke, is that we don’t know the criteria by which judgement has been made. Eko is told to repent, but in what respect would repentance be accepted? The Christian doctrine? Muslim? A whole new brand entirely? None of these things.

    And yes, Yemi having a lighter was deeply troubling for me.

    +1 For the effort, but the whole thing is still too cloudy for me none-the-less.

  3. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 11:15 a.m. Comment: 3

    What “cost” does God demand for life? Doesn’t God in fact give his own life for the lives of others—the sacrifice of an innocent is the cost for our lives. If a cost is being demanded of us (as in confession, justice)—is this really God making the demand? Key characters”

    We are treading on thin ice. Here we go again. Fate vs. Free will with some sovereignty thrown in for good measure.

  4. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 11:30 a.m. Comment: 4

    Hey kat

  5. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 11:56 a.m. Comment: 5

    Running away eh? You yellow bleep

  6. jazprof Dec 14, 2007 12:35 p.m. Comment: 6

    AC—I guess my take is no divine power of any faith is asking for Eko’s repentance. My reading of the first scene with the Nun demanding that Eko confess for the sin of stealing when hungry is that the Nun is not a true representative of God in that scene—she misrepresents what God is about. I think it’s a human force behind smokie. At this moment I’m going with Ben. It could turn out to be someone else, but I think a human someone else.

    jaz skates off before electro-magnetic forces can gather

  7. wtfsignmeup Dec 14, 2007 2:43 p.m. Comment: 7

    Jaz, this episode is full of clues imo. I love the parallel you drew between the nun forcing Ekos confession and the militia forcing the people to pay for protection, and they parallel in a way, with BS Yemi demanding Ekos confession.Eko obviously wasn’t willing to pay the ‘cost’. It sort of works in with the sacrifice the island demanded of Locke in Boones death.The island does seem to be some form of deity…You could almost look at Locke, Eko and Desmond as modern day prophets,receiving messages from God and being punished if they don’t follow through with Gods plans. Great post! +1

  8. jazprof Dec 14, 2007 3:02 p.m. Comment: 8

    thanks wtf—yeah I think this episode has a lot of material to dissect. One more thought about the Juliet-Ben long-con and mercy/justice. I think they count on the fact that as a Doctor Jack will be forced to go with mercy. Perhaps they count on the fact that he’ll strike a bargain too—but also that he won’t just do what Juliet tells him to here, which is to kill Ben and make it look like an accident. As a Doctor, and well, just being who he is as a person, I don’t think Jack’s capable of that and they know it.

  9. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 4:43 p.m. Comment: 9

    Oh but Jack is capable. He shunned the oath when he offed Mars. To me, that is when he went south.

  10. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 4:47 p.m. Comment: 10

    OK, “shunned” is harsh. He felt it necessary to alleviate suffering.

  11. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 4:57 p.m. Comment: 11

    I’ll take blue the jay for 200 Alex. It may take over, but at least it is honest.

  12. jazprof Dec 14, 2007 5:11 p.m. Comment: 12

    Sham, yeah I thought Jack killing the Marshall was more in keeping with what he felt necessary as a Dr. (to relieve suffering). Blue the jay? Blew the “J”? as in ganja?

  13. shamballa Dec 14, 2007 5:34 p.m. Comment: 13

    Mercy killing, euthanasia, call it what you will… it still is against the Hippocratic oath.

    I think Jack turned a corner there. There is no going back now. He lost his bearings at that point and is trying to get back on track.

  14. Quarantine Dec 14, 2007 8:32 p.m. Comment: 14

    Jazprof: Man, reading your stuff is always a treat. If you lived in Chicago,I would love to hang with you and just swap ideas until the Cubs take the pennant.

  15. jazprof Dec 14, 2007 9:12 p.m. Comment: 15

    Q: “until the cubs take the pennant” :-)

    So we’d be hangin’ out for a while I take it? Unless the electromagnetic forces bring down another plane on the island. :-)

  16. lockeko Dec 16, 2007 10:39 a.m. Comment: 16

    +1 great effort

  17. CaptainFilth Dec 17, 2007 2:08 a.m. Comment: 17

    Wait wait wait… back up a bit… in your mind jazprof, is ben good, evil or just a tool?

  18. jazprof Dec 17, 2007 6:43 a.m. Comment: 18

    CF—I think we’re beyond good and evil, here…ahem

    No , really I don’t think Ben is a tool—not even in the “He’s such a tool” sense—rather he’s the tool user. I think that Jacob has power and Ben is using that power to enforce his idea of what is good. I believe him when he says that they are the good guys. But I think his definition of good is based on fear, authority, control, and manipulation. In that way I would ally him with the forces of justice in the episode—the forces that require repentance and confession. I think Jacob is the tool that Ben is using but that Jacob is much more of an innocent (like Boo Radley in TKaMB)—and that if not under Ben’s control he (Jacob) would be much closer to mercy than justice.

  19. jazprof Dec 17, 2007 7:33 a.m. Comment: 19

    many, many thanks kat-limentary. Coming to the end of my Group 1’s sniff so I’m a tryin’ extra hard. I’m sure going to miss doing them ‘cause they make me reflect on so many things. Those Lost guys—they sure know what they’re doing :-)

    Thanks again, sweetness.

  20. LittleBen Dec 17, 2007 10:54 a.m. Comment: 20

    The synapses in your brain work different to other humans ! : ) +1 (+2 if I could). Is mercy trying to manifest itself through the Losties? I think definitely. Many thanks, amazing.

  21. ProfOzone Dec 17, 2007 11:04 a.m. Comment: 21

    Johns comment to Desmond about coincidence and fate… wasn’t this a reversal of what Eko told John in the Swan?

  22. jazprof Dec 17, 2007 11:09 a.m. Comment: 22

    Prof, I think it’s the same thing Eko said to John—that’s why I was thinking that it’s Des’s turn to make some of the mistakes that John had made.

  23. jazprof Dec 17, 2007 11:43 a.m. Comment: 23

    Oh Hey LB, thanks so much—and sorry for forgetting to cite your very related post: http://lost-theories.com/theories/2007/aug/16/who-island-has-conscience-subs/

  24. ProfOzone Dec 17, 2007 11:55 a.m. Comment: 24

    True, jaz, but it seems to me that they had opposite meanings. I mean, when you think about it, the phrase can be taken both ways. “Don’t mistake coincidence for fate,” could mean, “Don’t think it’s coincidence when it’s actually fate,” OR “Don’t think it’s fate when it’s actually coincidence”. If I say, “Don’t mistake jaz for kat.” I could mean, “Don’t think it’s jaz when it’s really kat,” but I could also mean, “Don’t think it’s kat when it’s really jaz.” I think when Eko said it, he meant that John shouldn’t jump to conclusions about fate, but when John said it to Desmond I think John meant that he thought Desmond should recognize fate.

  25. jazprof Dec 17, 2007 12:16 p.m. Comment: 25

    Ah, I see the difference you’re pointing to, but why do you think at this point John would be giving Des that instruction because by giving up Penny and coming to the island in order to turn the key he would, it seems, out of all the characters, have accepted fate. But has he been led astray do you think in this acceptance—is this his misrecognition? He shouldn’t have mistaken what Mrs. Hawking told him as fate, perhaps? Maybe that would explain why he seems to be apparently trying to change fate in Charlie’s case—he begins to suspect that what she told him about fate is false?

  26. jazprof Dec 17, 2007 12:20 p.m. Comment: 26

    As for mistaking jaz for kat, or kat for jaz….well, we have been spending a lot of time in that straitjacket…

    Tell you what…why doesn’t someone try it and see what happens. I hear experimental philosophy is all the rage these days…

  27. dabiatchishere Dec 17, 2007 3:34 p.m. Comment: 27

    Jazzie, I think this is one of your best ever! At least I really enjoyed it! I love the comparisons of justice vs mercy! I think this plays very well into our story line. It has everything to do with redemption, on behalf of our beloved “losties”, doesn’t it? So, this leads me to believe that “the island” is responsible for brandishing its own form of justice! Brilliant! +1

    Proffie, I will have to ask that you not make Dabbie’s little head spin like that again!! LOL Loved it!